Sunday, May 08, 2011

Interim Leader: pending failure or sign of change 2 come?

Why is the LPC taking queues from a former PM from 10 yrs ago? Isn't Jean Chrétien retired? Why would his advice be more valuable than that of Paul Martin or Stéphane Dion?

Why are we even going there? Why isn't anyone worried about engaging the grass roots, or the paid members in making this important decision?

Why can't the LPC think outside box the Ol' Boys Club?

Why can't there be a rotating interim leader every term (Sept to June) for 3 yrs?

Why does the Party have to rush to find a perm leader right away? And do it in a backroom to boot?

Don't tell me the Liberal constitution doesn't allow for it because they seem to have no prob bending the rules to benefit the OBC. #MartinCauchon

That stupid constitution is a ball and chain, and the LPC needs to untie itself from the Titanic while there's still time.

Recommend this post

3 comments:

A Eliz. said...

If you get a chance to look at the Sunday Toronto Star, read Angelo Persichilli. I don't usually read him because I thought he was a Conservative, but I do not know because he is bang on about the Liberal Party.

C-Nuck said...

The LPC Constitution is not a ball and chain. It was approved by a National Convention of the Party.

It is the expression of the rank and file of the Party. Suspended the constitution or avoiding it's requirements would be a back room deal.

DivaRachel said...

@C-Nuck : looks like they are changing the constitution again....